Environmental, Agriculture & Applied Sciences 

From the field, lab or facility, nearly 12% of SR&ED claims stem from resolving real-world technical uncertainties.

What Qualifies?

Environmental Performance Improvements

Developing methods to reduce waste, emissions, contamination, or resource consumption where existing solutions proved insufficient. 

Agricultural Innovation

Testing growing methods, nutrient systems, environmental controls, processing techniques, or production improvements. 

Resource Efficiency Projects

Improving energy use, water consumption, recycling, recovery, or sustainability performance through systematic investigation. 

Applied Scientific Development

Creating new processes, equipment, materials, or methodologies requiring experimental validation. 

Common Examples

Waste Reduction Systems

Developing technologies to minimize environmental impact or improve recovery rates. 

Agricultural Production Methods

Testing cultivation, harvesting, storage, or processing techniques. 

Water Treatment & Recovery

Developing systems to improve treatment efficiency or resource utilization. 

Sustainable Product Development

Creating environmentally responsible alternatives to existing products or materials. 

Top Misconceptions

Only lab-based science counts.
Field testing and pilot programs often involve significant technical uncertainty.
We were just improving efficiency.
Efficiency gains achieved through experimentation can be eligible.
Using existing technology means no SR&ED
Integrating or adapting technology to overcome unknowns can create technological advancement.
Agriculture is too traditional for SR&ED.
Modern agriculture is driven by trials, automation, system optimization, and data-driven innovation.
Failed projects don’t count.
Failures demonstrate uncertainty, they often strengthen the claim that R&D happened.

Industry-Specific Opportunities